- AWS usage has grown through migration, product expansion, acquisitions, or multiple engineering teams.
- IAM, public exposure, networking, workload identity, or account boundaries are difficult to reason about confidently.
- An enterprise buyer, diligence process, or incident has created a need for evidence beyond configuration scans.
AWS Security Assessment
A focused AWS security review combining automated evidence collection with expert analysis of identities, networking, data, workloads, logging, and cloud-native delivery paths.
Indicative USD baseline for a clearly bounded scope.
Calendar timing depends on access, evidence, target size, and stakeholder availability.
Scope, assumptions, deliverables, timeline, and price are confirmed before delivery begins.
No surprise hourly overages on agreed packaged work. If the scope changes materially, additional work is agreed in writing before it starts.
Recognize the decision before choosing the scope.
Which identity, network, workload, and data paths could realistically affect the product or customer trust?
Where are privilege boundaries weak or exposure broader than intended?
Focused on the controls that change real product risk.
The exact evidence set is tailored during discovery. A typical engagement covers the areas below.
- Organizations, accounts, IAM, roles, and privilege boundaries
- VPCs, security groups, public exposure, and network paths
- S3, RDS, EC2, Lambda, EKS, and workload configuration
- KMS, secrets, sensitive data, and encryption controls
- CloudTrail, detection services, logging, and auditability
- CI/CD, IaC, workload identity, and cloud-to-product attack paths
A decision package — not a scanner export.
Recommendations are prioritized, contextualized, and structured so engineering and leadership can move from findings to action.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Clear scope. Evidence. Priorities. Remediation.
Goals, environment, constraints, evidence, and success criteria.
Technical and process assessment with targeted automation where useful.
Risk, attack paths, engineering effort, and business context.
Report, roadmap, workshop, and optional remediation validation.
Typical engagement: 1–3 weeks, depending on account count and environment complexity.
Know what changes, what is needed, and what can follow.
What changes after
- Cloud remediation is prioritized around realistic exposure and attack paths rather than benchmark volume.
- Identity and public-access decisions become easier to explain and validate.
What we need from you
- Read-only AWS evidence for the agreed accounts or environment plus a current architecture overview.
- Representative IaC, CI/CD, workload-identity, and secrets-management context where relevant.
Natural next steps
Build a broader engagement.
Product Security Program Assessment
Know where your Product Security program stands — and what to improve first.
02Secure SDLC Assessment
Build security into the way software moves from idea to production.
03Secure Architecture & Threat Modeling
Find architectural risk before it becomes production vulnerability.
Bring the architecture, problem, or current security backlog.
We can define the smallest useful scope and a clear output before work begins.