- A major release, feature, migration, or customer commitment needs independent technical validation.
- Authentication, authorization, tenant isolation, business logic, API behavior, or a cloud attack path needs hands-on evidence.
- A buyer or assurance process requires a scoped penetration test rather than a broad maturity assessment.
Application & Cloud Security Testing
Specialized testing for web applications, APIs, mobile applications, and cloud environments — aligned to product context and followed by practical remediation guidance.
Indicative USD baseline for a clearly bounded scope.
Calendar timing depends on access, evidence, target size, and stakeholder availability.
Scope, assumptions, deliverables, timeline, and price are confirmed before delivery begins.
No surprise hourly overages on agreed packaged work. If the scope changes materially, additional work is agreed in writing before it starts.
Recognize the decision before choosing the scope.
Which attack paths are practically exploitable within the agreed target and rules of engagement?
What is the real technical and product impact of the validated findings?
Focused on the controls that change real product risk.
The exact evidence set is tailored during discovery. A typical engagement covers the areas below.
- Web application penetration testing
- API security and penetration testing
- Cloud penetration testing
- Mobile application security testing
- Authentication, authorization, and business-logic abuse
- Retesting and remediation validation
A decision package — not a scanner export.
Recommendations are prioritized, contextualized, and structured so engineering and leadership can move from findings to action.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Included or adapted to the agreed engagement scope.
Clear scope. Evidence. Priorities. Remediation.
Goals, environment, constraints, evidence, and success criteria.
Technical and process assessment with targeted automation where useful.
Risk, attack paths, engineering effort, and business context.
Report, roadmap, workshop, and optional remediation validation.
Timeline depends on target size and depth; fixed-scope proposals are available after discovery.
Know what changes, what is needed, and what can follow.
What changes after
- Engineering gets validated evidence instead of assumptions or scanner-only findings.
- Remediation priorities are tied to exploitability, product context, and business impact.
What we need from you
- Explicit written authorization, agreed targets, safe-testing constraints, and escalation contacts.
- Test accounts/roles and relevant architecture or API documentation according to the chosen black/gray/white-box model.
Natural next steps
Build a broader engagement.
Product Security Program Assessment
Know where your Product Security program stands — and what to improve first.
02Secure SDLC Assessment
Build security into the way software moves from idea to production.
03Secure Architecture & Threat Modeling
Find architectural risk before it becomes production vulnerability.
Bring the architecture, problem, or current security backlog.
We can define the smallest useful scope and a clear output before work begins.